The layers a question passes through, top to bottom: the read-only
surface that serves the answer, and under it the context layer — the engine that
constructs the answer, over the resolved records it is built from. Every block is a button:
click it to see what that block does and what was measured on it.
Serving Boundary — read-only MCP surface
10 tenant-scoped tools, token-bound; no write path.
Provenance columns are non-null from the first migration.
Edge-to-source-record drill-down.
Served per fact over MCP (provenance tool) and inside every conflict claim.
Bi-temporal — knowledge time and world time.
Knowledge time: ingested_at / superseded_at — what the system believed at T.
World time: valid_from / valid_to — when the fact was true.
As-of parameters on triples, graph reads, and the MCP tools traverse_graph and trace_query.
Standard graded record — 43 questions × 3 data draws
each question graded against three independent data draws
Full graded record — 20 compound questions × 3 instances per frame × 2 frames (120 graded rows)
legend✓ committed answer matches gold · ✗ committed answer wrong against gold · — abstain, no committed answer · a refusal where the store held the answer is a defect, not a neutral outcome · stance records the committed-vs-refusal read of the answer text, independent of the grade · tie golds show the accept-set (A|B) — either member grades correct.
provenanceGraded under the registered stance-aware instrument (ledger events 2176/2179, frozen matchers) · one uncached held-out pass per frame · result appended to the append-only ledger as event 2195.
Clean frameclientone_fresh10 · client_one lineage · n=60 · held-out · 1 uncached pass✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Blantenzulba business unit is the MOST below-ratecard versus market, restricted to practices paying below market?
goldTalqueveth-tgt-practice-000001
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the answer is:
**Talqueveth-tgt-practice-000001**
This practice has the highest additive metric value (42000) among the 3 candidate entities in the Blantenzulba scope when restricted to practices below the shared reference value.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Blantenzulba business unit is the MOST below-ratecard versus market, restricted to practices paying below market?
goldUlvriktan-tgt-practice-000001
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the answer is:
**Ulvriktan-tgt-practice-000001**
This practice has the highest additive metric value (42000) among the 3 candidate entities in the Blantenzulba scope that are restricted to those below the shared reference value.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Blantenzulba business unit is the MOST below-ratecard versus market, restricted to practices paying below market?
goldNyxobrand-tgt-practice-000001
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the answer is:
**Nyxobrand-tgt-practice-000001**
This practice has the highest additive metric value (42000) among the 3 candidate entities in the Blantenzulba scope when restricted to practices below the shared reference value.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong practices below market in the Blantenzorpi business unit, which one is the LEAST below-ratecard?
goldDrenvaculo-tgt-practice-000006
recorded answer**Drenvaculo-tgt-practice-000006**
This practice has the minimum additive metric value (3000) among the 3 candidates below the Blantenzorpi scope's reference value, making it the least below-ratecard.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong practices below market in the Blantenzorpi business unit, which one is the LEAST below-ratecard?
goldAmbrozeqvi-tgt-practice-000006
recorded answer**Ambrozeqvi-tgt-practice-000006**
This practice has the minimum below-market metric value (3000) among the 3 candidates evaluated in the Blantenzorpi scope, making it the least below-ratecard.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong practices below market in the Blantenzorpi business unit, which one is the LEAST below-ratecard?
goldZolvantrik-tgt-practice-000006
recorded answer**Zolvantrik-tgt-practice-000006**
This practice has the lowest (least negative) deviation from the rate card benchmark at the computed metric value of 3000 among the 3 candidate entities below the Blantenzorpi scope's shared reference value.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Blantenzimmo business unit sits MOST ABOVE market (the biggest positive gap versus the benchmark)?
goldWrivantosk-tgt-practice-00000b
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Wrivantosk-tgt-practice-00000b** is the practice in the Blantenzimmo business unit with the biggest positive gap versus the benchmark, with a computed additive metric value of 47000.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Blantenzimmo business unit sits MOST ABOVE market (the biggest positive gap versus the benchmark)?
goldZolvantrik-tgt-practice-00000b
recorded answerBased on the facts provided:
**Zolvantrik-tgt-practice-00000b**
This practice has the highest computed additive metric value (47000) among the 3 candidate entities in the Blantenzimmo scope, indicating it sits most above the market benchmark.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Blantenzimmo business unit sits MOST ABOVE market (the biggest positive gap versus the benchmark)?
goldTalqueveth-tgt-practice-00000b
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Talqueveth-tgt-practice-00000b** is the practice in the Blantenzimmo business unit that sits most above market, with a computed additive metric value of 47000 representing the biggest positive gap versus the benchmark.
stancecommitted
— ABSTAINWhich practice in the Blantenzanku business unit is the MOST below-ratecard versus market?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, I cannot answer this question.
The data shows billed rates for two practices (Marzuvenn-tgt-practice-000011 and Ulvriktan-tgt-practice-000010) in the Blantenzanku scope, but there is no information about:
- Rate-card benchmarks
- Market rates
- The gap between billed rates and either benchmark
The note explicitly states: "billed_rates/rate_card_benchmark in two sources; base cannot [resolve] the gap."
To answer which practice is most below-ratecard versus market, I would need the actual rate-card and market rate values for comparison.
stancerefusal
— ABSTAINWhich practice in the Blantenzanku business unit is the MOST below-ratecard versus market?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, I cannot answer this question.
The facts contain information about billed rates and an additive metric value (33000) for entities in the Blantenzanku scope, but they do not include:
- Rate card values
- Market rate benchmarks
- A comparison metric showing which practice is "below-ratecard versus market"
The note explicitly states "base cannot [compute] the gap," indicating the necessary data for this comparison is unavailable.
stancerefusal
— ABSTAINWhich practice in the Blantenzanku business unit is the MOST below-ratecard versus market?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, I cannot answer this question.
The data shows billed rates for two practices (Sqirbonat-tgt-practice-000010 and Vostrigan-tgt-practice-000011) in the Blantenzanku scope, but there is no information about rate-card benchmarks or market rates needed to determine which practice is "most below-ratecard versus market." The note explicitly states "base cannot [compute] the gap" between billed rates and rate-card benchmarks.
stancerefusal
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Ceqzalchimmo business unit owns the workstream with the MOST cloud-cost growth?
goldWrivantosk-tgt-practice-000032
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the answer is:
**Wrivantosk-tgt-practice-000032**
This practice holds the highest attribution metric value (75000) for the Ceqzalchimmo scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Ceqzalchimmo business unit owns the workstream with the MOST cloud-cost growth?
goldHelkantrix-tgt-practice-000032
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the answer is **Helkantrix-tgt-practice-000032**.
This practice holds the highest attribution metric value (75000) for the Ceqzalchimmo scope and owns workstream wrk-sculptorix-tgt-workstream-00002f.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Ceqzalchimmo business unit owns the workstream with the MOST cloud-cost growth?
goldHelkantrix-tgt-practice-000032
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the answer is **Helkantrix-tgt-practice-000032**.
This practice holds the highest attribution metric value (75000) for the Ceqzalchimmo scope and is identified as the workstream owner.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Ceqzalchanku business unit has the LEAST cost per delivered output?
goldWrivantosk-tgt-practice-000038
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Wrivantosk-tgt-practice-000038** has the least cost per delivered output in the Ceqzalchanku scope, with an attribution metric value of 200.0.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Ceqzalchanku business unit has the LEAST cost per delivered output?
goldVostrigan-tgt-practice-000038
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Vostrigan-tgt-practice-000038** has the least cost per delivered output in the Ceqzalchanku business unit, with an attribution metric value of 200.0.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich practice in the Ceqzalchanku business unit has the LEAST cost per delivered output?
goldWrivantosk-tgt-practice-000038
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Wrivantosk-tgt-practice-000038** has the least cost per delivered output in the Ceqzalchanku scope, with an attribution metric value of 200.0.
However, I must note: the facts indicate only 1 candidate entity was evaluated, and the note states "cost/ownership/output in three sources; base can't join wrk->practice->output." This suggests the underlying data may have join limitations that could affect the completeness of this comparison.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2025-09-30 (pre-transfer), which practice owned the TOP-cost workstream in the Ceqzalchezzo business unit?
goldWrivantosk-tgt-practice-00003d
recorded answer**Wrivantosk-tgt-practice-00003d**
This practice owned the top-cost workstream (attribution metric value: 90000) in the Ceqzalchezzo scope as of 2025-09-30.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2025-09-30 (pre-transfer), which practice owned the TOP-cost workstream in the Ceqzalchezzo business unit?
goldMarzuvenn-tgt-practice-00003d
recorded answer**Marzuvenn-tgt-practice-00003d**
This practice held the highest attribution metric value (90000) for the Ceqzalchezzo scope as of 2025-09-30 and owned workstream wrk-sculptorix-tgt-workstream-00003b.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2025-09-30 (pre-transfer), which practice owned the TOP-cost workstream in the Ceqzalchezzo business unit?
goldZolvantrik-tgt-practice-00003d
recorded answer**Zolvantrik-tgt-practice-00003d**
This practice owned the top-cost workstream (wrk-vantrezuli-tgt-workstream-00003b) in the Ceqzalchezzo scope as of 2025-09-30, with an attribution metric value of 90000.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2026-03-31 (post-transfer), which practice owns the workstream with the MOST cost growth in the Ceqzalchyrra business unit?
goldNyxobrand-tgt-practice-000043
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Nyxobrand-tgt-practice-000043** owns the workstream with the highest attribution metric (70000) in the Ceqzalchyrra scope as of 2026-03-31.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2026-03-31 (post-transfer), which practice owns the workstream with the MOST cost growth in the Ceqzalchyrra business unit?
goldQuinderoxx-tgt-practice-000043
recorded answer**Quinderoxx-tgt-practice-000043**
This practice holds the highest attribution metric value (70,000) for cost growth in the Ceqzalchyrra scope as of 2026-03-31 and owns workstream wrk-brinquoxal-tgt-workstream-000040.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2026-03-31 (post-transfer), which practice owns the workstream with the MOST cost growth in the Ceqzalchyrra business unit?
goldQuinderoxx-tgt-practice-000043
recorded answer**Quinderoxx-tgt-practice-000043**
This practice holds the highest attribution metric value (70000) for cost growth in the Ceqzalchyrra scope as of 2026-03-31 and owns workstream wrk-zeltravun-tgt-workstream-000040.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAfter netting the cross-system double-count, which client in the Blantenzezzo delivery_model has the TOP concentration?
goldcli-brellixan-tgt-client-000015
recorded answer**cli-brellixan-tgt-client-000015**
This client holds the highest netting metric value of 520,000 in the Blantenzezzo scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAfter netting the cross-system double-count, which client in the Blantenzezzo delivery_model has the TOP concentration?
goldcli-quirzaben-tgt-client-000015
recorded answer**cli-quirzaben-tgt-client-000015**
This client holds the highest netting metric value of 520,000 in the Blantenzezzo scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAfter netting the cross-system double-count, which client in the Blantenzezzo delivery_model has the TOP concentration?
goldcli-brellixan-tgt-client-000015
recorded answer**cli-brellixan-tgt-client-000015**
This client holds the highest netting metric value of 520,000 in the Blantenzezzo scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich client in the Blantenzyrra delivery_model has the BOTTOM netted concentration?
goldcli-quondrave-tgt-client-000018
recorded answer**cli-quondrave-tgt-client-000018**
This client holds the lowest netting metric value (90000) in the Blantenzyrra scope across 3 candidate entities.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich client in the Blantenzyrra delivery_model has the BOTTOM netted concentration?
goldcli-vorzentiq-tgt-client-000018
recorded answer**cli-vorzentiq-tgt-client-000018**
This client holds the lowest netting metric value (90000) across the 3 candidate entities in the Blantenzyrra scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich client in the Blantenzyrra delivery_model has the BOTTOM netted concentration?
goldcli-drexumval-tgt-client-000018
recorded answer**cli-drexumval-tgt-client-000018**
This client holds the lowest netting metric value (90000) in the Blantenzyrra scope across 3 candidate entities.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of the current restatement (post-supersession), which client in the Blantenzoxxi delivery_model has the TOP netted concentration?
goldcli-wixomarel-tgt-client-00001c
recorded answer**cli-wixomarel-tgt-client-00001c**
This client holds the highest netting metric value (460000) in the Blantenzoxxi scope across the 3 candidate entities evaluated.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of the current restatement (post-supersession), which client in the Blantenzoxxi delivery_model has the TOP netted concentration?
goldcli-trenqualo-tgt-client-00001c
recorded answer**cli-trenqualo-tgt-client-00001c**
This client holds the highest netting metric value (460000) in the Blantenzoxxi scope across the 3 candidate entities evaluated.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of the current restatement (post-supersession), which client in the Blantenzoxxi delivery_model has the TOP netted concentration?
goldcli-zynquorel-tgt-client-00001c
recorded answer**cli-zynquorel-tgt-client-00001c**
This client holds the highest netting metric value (460000) in the Blantenzoxxi scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich engagement_account in the Ceqzalchoxxi delivery_model has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldcli-zolbrixane-tgt-client-000045
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the answer is:
**cli-zolbrixane-tgt-client-000045**
This entity holds the highest computed risk metric value (400000.0) in the Ceqzalchoxxi scope across 4 candidate entities.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich engagement_account in the Ceqzalchoxxi delivery_model has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldcli-brantelquo-tgt-client-000045
recorded answer**cli-brantelquo-tgt-client-000045**
This entity has the highest computed risk metric value of 400,000.0 in the Ceqzalchoxxi scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich engagement_account in the Ceqzalchoxxi delivery_model has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldcli-zolbrixane-tgt-client-000045
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the answer is:
**cli-zolbrixane-tgt-client-000045**
This entity holds the highest computed risk metric value (400000.0) in the Ceqzalchoxxi scope across 4 candidate entities.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich engagement_account in the Ceqzalchuvvu delivery_model has the LOWEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldcli-brizamento-tgt-client-000049
recorded answer**cli-brizamento-tgt-client-000049**
This engagement account has the lowest risk metric value (12000.0) in the Ceqzalchuvvu scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich engagement_account in the Ceqzalchuvvu delivery_model has the LOWEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldcli-brizamento-tgt-client-000049
recorded answer**cli-brizamento-tgt-client-000049**
This engagement account has the lowest risk metric value (12000.0) in the Ceqzalchuvvu scope across the 3 candidate entities evaluated.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich engagement_account in the Ceqzalchuvvu delivery_model has the LOWEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldcli-quaventriz-tgt-client-000049
recorded answer**cli-quaventriz-tgt-client-000049**
This engagement account has the lowest computed risk metric value of 12000.0 in the Ceqzalchuvvu scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich engagement_account in the Ceqzalchykki delivery_model has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the engagement accounts with the highest risk metric value (200000.0) in the Ceqzalchykki scope are:
**cli-brantelquo-tgt-client-00004d** and **cli-quirvozant-tgt-client-00004e** (tied)
However, the facts note that "base can't billed_ratesute the weighted exposure," indicating the risk-weighted exposure cannot be fully computed from the available data.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich engagement_account in the Ceqzalchykki delivery_model has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the entities tied for the highest risk metric value (200000.0) in the Ceqzalchykki scope are:
**cli-quirvozant-tgt-client-00004e** and **cli-zentraquol-tgt-client-00004d**
Both engagement accounts hold the maximum computed risk value equally.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich engagement_account in the Ceqzalchykki delivery_model has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the entities tied for the highest risk metric value (200000.0) in the 'Ceqzalchykki' scope are:
**cli-quirvozant-tgt-client-00004e** and **cli-zamvoritql-tgt-client-00004d**
Both engagement accounts hold the maximum computed risk value equally.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich signed engagement in the Ceqzalchulba territory has the LEAST timesheets of any engagement (zero touches -- stalled)?
goldeng-volmatriqz-tgt-engagement-000028
recorded answer**eng-volmatriqz-tgt-engagement-000028**
This engagement is signed in the Ceqzalchulba scope and has 0 touches (timesheets), making it the least active engagement.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich signed engagement in the Ceqzalchulba territory has the LEAST timesheets of any engagement (zero touches -- stalled)?
goldeng-quexvarnol-tgt-engagement-000028
recorded answer**eng-quexvarnol-tgt-engagement-000028**
This engagement is signed (stage: "signed") in the Ceqzalchulba scope and has 0 timesheets (touch_count: 0), making it the least active engagement.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich signed engagement in the Ceqzalchulba territory has the LEAST timesheets of any engagement (zero touches -- stalled)?
goldeng-vandrezoqu-tgt-engagement-000028
recorded answer**eng-vandrezoqu-tgt-engagement-000028**
This engagement is signed and has 0 touches (timesheets), making it the least active engagement in the Ceqzalchulba territory.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich signed engagement in the Ceqzalchulba territory has the MOST timesheets?
goldeng-quantorvex-tgt-engagement-000029
recorded answer**eng-quantorvex-tgt-engagement-000029**
This engagement has a stage of "signed" in the Ceqzalchulba scope and holds the highest touch count (timesheets) at 14.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich signed engagement in the Ceqzalchulba territory has the MOST timesheets?
goldeng-xoramzintl-tgt-engagement-000029
recorded answer**eng-xoramzintl-tgt-engagement-000029**
This signed engagement in the Ceqzalchulba scope has 14 timesheets, the highest among the 4 candidate entities evaluated.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich signed engagement in the Ceqzalchulba territory has the MOST timesheets?
goldeng-zibrantoq-tgt-engagement-000029
recorded answer**eng-zibrantoq-tgt-engagement-000029**
This engagement has 14 timesheets and is in the "signed" stage within the Ceqzalchulba scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich signed engagement in the Ceqzalchorpi territory is stalled (confirmed zero timesheets, LEAST engagement)?
goldeng-zilbrandoq-tgt-engagement-00002c
recorded answer**eng-zilbrandoq-tgt-engagement-00002c**
This engagement is signed (per client_directory) with zero timesheets (confirmed stalled), and holds the lowest stage metric value (0) across the 2 candidate entities in the Ceqzalchorpi scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich signed engagement in the Ceqzalchorpi territory is stalled (confirmed zero timesheets, LEAST engagement)?
goldeng-brenquilax-tgt-engagement-00002c
recorded answer**eng-brenquilax-tgt-engagement-00002c**
This engagement is signed (stage: "signed") in the Ceqzalchorpi scope with zero timesheets (touch_count: 0), representing the least engagement.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich signed engagement in the Ceqzalchorpi territory is stalled (confirmed zero timesheets, LEAST engagement)?
goldeng-volmatriqz-tgt-engagement-00002c
recorded answer**eng-volmatriqz-tgt-engagement-00002c**
This engagement is signed (stage: "signed") in the Ceqzalchorpi scope with zero timesheets (touch_count: 0), representing the least engagement.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich subcontractor in the Blantenzuvvu portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, allocated, and effectively zero feature usage)?
goldsub-vornalixet-tgt-subcontractor-00001f
recorded answer**sub-vornalixet-tgt-subcontractor-00001f**
This subcontractor has 45 allocated units and $38,000 in spend as of 2026-03-31, but zero feature events and zero SSO logins, indicating zero effective utilization despite the allocation and cost.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich subcontractor in the Blantenzuvvu portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, allocated, and effectively zero feature usage)?
goldsub-quilzander-tgt-subcontractor-00001f
recorded answer**sub-quilzander-tgt-subcontractor-00001f**
This subcontractor has 45 allocated units and $38,000 in spend against zero feature events and zero SSO logins in the Blantenzuvvu scope as of 2026-03-31, indicating zero effective utilization despite full allocation and payment.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich subcontractor in the Blantenzuvvu portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, allocated, and effectively zero feature usage)?
goldsub-trixanvold-tgt-subcontractor-00001f
recorded answer**sub-trixanvold-tgt-subcontractor-00001f**
This subcontractor has:
- **$38,000 spent** (allocated budget)
- **45 allocated units**
- **0 feature events and 0 SSO logins** (zero utilization)
This represents complete waste with no measurable usage despite full allocation and spend.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong paid and allocated subcontractors in the Blantenzuvvu portfolio, which one has the HIGHEST utilization?
goldsub-xelbraviq-tgt-subcontractor-000020
recorded answer**sub-xelbraviq-tgt-subcontractor-000020**
This subcontractor has the highest utilization in the Blantenzuvvu scope with 1000 sso_logins (the computed triple metric value), and is both paid ($15,000 spend) and allocated (60 units).
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong paid and allocated subcontractors in the Blantenzuvvu portfolio, which one has the HIGHEST utilization?
goldsub-zubrentiq-tgt-subcontractor-000020
recorded answer**sub-zubrentiq-tgt-subcontractor-000020**
This subcontractor has the highest utilization metric (1000) in the Blantenzuvvu scope among the 5 candidate entities evaluated.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong paid and allocated subcontractors in the Blantenzuvvu portfolio, which one has the HIGHEST utilization?
goldsub-zubrentiq-tgt-subcontractor-000020
recorded answer**sub-zubrentiq-tgt-subcontractor-000020**
This subcontractor has the highest utilization metric (1000) in the Blantenzuvvu scope among the 5 candidate entities evaluated.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich subcontractor in the Blantenzykki portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, allocated, zero feature usage)?
recorded answer**sub-quilzander-tgt-subcontractor-000024**
This subcontractor has:
- $25,000 allocated spend
- 40 allocated units
- 0 feature events (zero usage)
This represents the highest wasteful metric across the 3 candidate entities in the Blantenzykki scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich subcontractor in the Blantenzykki portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, allocated, zero feature usage)?
recorded answer**sub-quorbezant-tgt-subcontractor-000024**
This subcontractor has:
- **Allocated units:** 40
- **Spend:** $25,000
- **Feature events:** 0
- **SSO logins:** 0
Zero utilization despite significant allocation and spend makes it the most wasteful in the Blantenzykki scope.
stancecommitted
Dirty frameestate4_fresh28+cg_predicted_v0 · estate_v4 lineage · cg_predicted_v0 · n=60 · held-out · 1 uncached pass✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Zempinchulba business unit is the MOST underpaid versus market, restricted to teams paying below market?
goldHelkantrix-tgt-team-000001
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the answer is **Helkantrix-tgt-team-000001**.
This team has the highest additive metric value (42000) among the 3 candidate entities in the Zempinchulba scope when restricted to teams below the shared reference value.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Zempinchulba business unit is the MOST underpaid versus market, restricted to teams paying below market?
goldZolvantrik-tgt-team-000001
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the answer is **Zolvantrik-tgt-team-000001**.
However, I must note that the facts state "comp/market_benchmark in two sources; base cannot compute the gap," which indicates the market benchmark comparison cannot be fully computed. The answer is derived from the parametric analysis showing this team has the highest additive metric value (42000) among candidates below the scope's reference value in the Zempinchulba unit.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Zempinchulba business unit is the MOST underpaid versus market, restricted to teams paying below market?
goldDrenvaculo-tgt-team-000001
recorded answer**Drenvaculo-tgt-team-000001**
This team has the highest additive underpayment metric (42000) among the 3 candidate entities in the Zempinchulba scope when restricted to teams below the market reference value.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong teams below market in the Zempinchorpi business unit, which one is the LEAST underpaid?
goldTalqueveth-tgt-team-000006
recorded answer**Talqueveth-tgt-team-000006**
This team has the lowest (least negative) compensation gap at 3000 among the 3 candidate teams below market in the Zempinchorpi scope, making it the least underpaid.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong teams below market in the Zempinchorpi business unit, which one is the LEAST underpaid?
goldSqirbonat-tgt-team-000006
recorded answer**Sqirbonat-tgt-team-000006**
This team has the lowest (least negative) gap among teams below market in the Zempinchorpi scope, with a computed metric value of 3000.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong teams below market in the Zempinchorpi business unit, which one is the LEAST underpaid?
goldNyxobrand-tgt-team-000006
recorded answer**Nyxobrand-tgt-team-000006**
This team has the lowest (least negative) underpayment metric value of 3000 among the 3 candidate teams below market in the Zempinchorpi scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Zempinchimmo business unit sits MOST ABOVE market (the biggest positive gap versus the benchmark)?
goldDrenvaculo-tgt-team-00000b
recorded answerBased on the facts provided:
**Drenvaculo-tgt-team-00000b**
This team has the highest additive metric value (47000) when restricted to candidates at or above the Zempinchimmo scope's shared reference value, indicating it sits most above the market benchmark.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Zempinchimmo business unit sits MOST ABOVE market (the biggest positive gap versus the benchmark)?
goldAmbrozeqvi-tgt-team-00000b
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Ambrozeqvi-tgt-team-00000b** is identified as the answer.
However, I must note a limitation: The facts state "comp/market_benchmark in two sources; base cannot compute the gap." This means the actual gap versus the market benchmark cannot be fully computed from the provided data. The answer is derived from the parametric analysis showing this team has the highest additive metric value (47000) in the Zempinchimmo scope, but this does not directly confirm it sits most above market in terms of a positive compensation gap.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Zempinchimmo business unit sits MOST ABOVE market (the biggest positive gap versus the benchmark)?
goldHelkantrix-tgt-team-00000b
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Helkantrix-tgt-team-00000b** is the answer.
This team has the highest additive metric value (47000) when restricted to candidates at or above the Zempinchimmo scope's shared reference value, indicating it sits most above market.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Zempinchanku business unit is the MOST underpaid versus market?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Marzuvenn-tgt-team-000011** and **Zolvantrik-tgt-team-000010** are tied as the most underpaid teams in the Zempinchanku business unit, both with a computed underpayment metric value of 33000.
However, the facts note that "comp/market_benchmark in two sources; base cannot compute the gap," indicating the market comparison analysis has limitations.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Zempinchanku business unit is the MOST underpaid versus market?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, there is a tie for the most underpaid team in the Zempinchanku business unit:
**Ambrozeqvi-tgt-team-000011** and **Nyxobrand-tgt-team-000010**
Both teams share the highest underpayment metric value of 33000.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Zempinchanku business unit is the MOST underpaid versus market?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, I cannot definitively answer which team is most underpaid versus market.
While the analysis identifies **Ambrozeqvi-tgt-team-000010** and **Drenvaculo-tgt-team-000011** as tied entities with the highest additive metric value (33000) in the Zempinchanku scope, the note explicitly states: "comp/market_benchmark in two sources; base cannot compute the gap."
This indicates the market benchmark data is insufficient to calculate the actual underpayment gap. Therefore, a conclusive answer about which team is most underpaid cannot be determined from these facts.
stancecommitted
— ABSTAINWhich team in the Blirkathimmo business unit owns the service with the MOST cloud-cost growth?
goldWrivantosk-tgt-team-000032
recorded answerI cannot answer this question based on the provided facts.
The facts explicitly state: "base lacks the svc->team join and can't compute growth." While the data identifies **Marzuvenn-tgt-team-000034** as owning a service in the Blirkathimmo scope, there is no computed growth metric available to determine which team owns the service with the most cloud-cost growth.
stancerefusal
— ABSTAINWhich team in the Blirkathimmo business unit owns the service with the MOST cloud-cost growth?
goldNyxobrand-tgt-team-000032
recorded answerI cannot answer this question based on the provided facts.
The facts explicitly state: "base lacks the svc->team join and can't compute growth." While the data identifies **Nyxobrand-tgt-team-000032** as owning a service in the Blirkathimmo scope, there is no growth metric computed, making it impossible to determine which team owns the service with the most cloud-cost growth.
stancerefusal
— ABSTAINWhich team in the Blirkathimmo business unit owns the service with the MOST cloud-cost growth?
goldVostrigan-tgt-team-000032
recorded answerI cannot answer this question based on the provided facts.
The facts indicate that a cost/ownership analysis was performed, but the note explicitly states: "base lacks the svc->team join and can't compute growth." Therefore, cloud-cost growth cannot be computed from the available data.
The discovered result shows only an attribution metric (75000) for Vostrigan-tgt-team-000032, but this is not a growth metric and does not answer the question as asked.
stancerefusal
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Blirkathanku business unit has the LEAST cost per delivered output?
goldTalqueveth-tgt-team-000038
recorded answer**Talqueveth-tgt-team-000038**
This team has the minimum attribution metric value of 200.0 in the Blirkathanku scope, representing the least cost per delivered output.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Blirkathanku business unit has the LEAST cost per delivered output?
goldVostrigan-tgt-team-000038
recorded answer**Vostrigan-tgt-team-000038**
This team has an attribution metric value of 200.0 (the minimum across candidates in the Blirkathanku scope) and shipped 100 units in 2026-Q1, resulting in a cost per delivered output of 2.0.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich team in the Blirkathanku business unit has the LEAST cost per delivered output?
goldAmbrozeqvi-tgt-team-000038
recorded answer**Ambrozeqvi-tgt-team-000038**
This team has an attribution metric value of 200.0 (the minimum across candidates in the Blirkathanku scope), representing the least cost per delivered output.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2025-09-30 (pre-transfer), which team owned the TOP-cost service in the Blirkathezzo business unit?
goldSqirbonat-tgt-team-00003d
recorded answer**Sqirbonat-tgt-team-00003d**
This team held ownership of the top-cost service (svc-quelbranox-tgt-svc-00003b) in the Blirkathezzo scope as of 2025-09-30, with an attribution metric value of 90000.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2025-09-30 (pre-transfer), which team owned the TOP-cost service in the Blirkathezzo business unit?
goldDrenvaculo-tgt-team-00003d
recorded answer**Drenvaculo-tgt-team-00003d**
This team holds the highest attribution metric value (90000) for the Blirkathezzo scope as of 2025-09-30 and owns the top-cost service in that business unit.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2025-09-30 (pre-transfer), which team owned the TOP-cost service in the Blirkathezzo business unit?
goldUlvriktan-tgt-team-00003d
recorded answer**Ulvriktan-tgt-team-00003d**
This team held ownership of the top-cost service (svc-brinquoxal-tgt-svc-00003b) in the Blirkathezzo scope as of 2025-09-30, with an attribution metric value of 90000.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2026-03-31 (post-transfer), which team owns the service with the MOST cost growth in the Blirkathyrra business unit?
goldAmbrozeqvi-tgt-team-000043
recorded answerBased on the facts provided:
**Ambrozeqvi-tgt-team-000043**
This team holds the highest attribution metric value (70000) for the Blirkathyrra scope as of 2026-03-31, and owns the service svc-helzuvant-tgt-svc-000040.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2026-03-31 (post-transfer), which team owns the service with the MOST cost growth in the Blirkathyrra business unit?
goldDrenvaculo-tgt-team-000043
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Drenvaculo-tgt-team-000043** owns the service with the highest attribution metric value (70000) in the Blirkathyrra scope as of 2026-03-31.
However, I must note that the facts do not explicitly state this metric represents "cost growth." The parametric axis describes it as an "attribution" metric with maximum polarity, but the specific definition of what this attribution measures relative to cost growth is not provided in the facts.
**Answer: Drenvaculo-tgt-team-000043**
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of 2026-03-31 (post-transfer), which team owns the service with the MOST cost growth in the Blirkathyrra business unit?
goldQuinderoxx-tgt-team-000043
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **Quinderoxx-tgt-team-000043** owns the service with the most cost growth in the Blirkathyrra business unit as of 2026-03-31, with an attribution metric value of 70000.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAfter netting the cross-system double-count, which customer in the Zempinchezzo segment has the TOP concentration?
goldcust-quondrave-tgt-cust-000015
recorded answer**cust-quondrave-tgt-cust-000015**
This customer holds the highest netting metric value of 520,000 in the Zempinchezzo scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAfter netting the cross-system double-count, which customer in the Zempinchezzo segment has the TOP concentration?
goldcust-brellixan-tgt-cust-000015
recorded answer**cust-brellixan-tgt-cust-000015**
This customer holds the highest netting metric value of 520,000 in the Zempinchezzo scope after accounting for the cross-system double-count between billing_revenue and gl_revenue.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAfter netting the cross-system double-count, which customer in the Zempinchezzo segment has the TOP concentration?
goldcust-fexundrai-tgt-cust-000015
recorded answer**cust-fexundrai-tgt-cust-000015**
This customer holds the highest netting metric value of 520,000 in the Zempinchezzo scope after accounting for the cross-system double-count between billing_revenue and gl_revenue.
stancecommitted
— ABSTAINWhich customer in the Zempinchyrra segment has the BOTTOM netted concentration?
goldcust-harzintuq-tgt-cust-000018
recorded answerI cannot answer this question from the facts provided. The facts show only one customer (cust-trenqualo-tgt-cust-00001a) in the Zempinchyrra segment, and the note explicitly states that the base "cannot net or detect the missing GL row." Therefore, there is insufficient data to determine netted concentration or compare multiple customers.
stancerefusal
✓ CORRECTWhich customer in the Zempinchyrra segment has the BOTTOM netted concentration?
goldcust-molvantiz-tgt-cust-000018
recorded answer**cust-molvantiz-tgt-cust-000018**
This customer holds the lowest netting metric value (90000) in the Zempinchyrra scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich customer in the Zempinchyrra segment has the BOTTOM netted concentration?
goldcust-trenqualo-tgt-cust-000018
recorded answer**cust-trenqualo-tgt-cust-000018**
This customer holds the lowest netting metric value (90000) across the 3 candidate entities in the Zempinchyrra scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of the current restatement (post-supersession), which customer in the Zempinchoxxi segment has the TOP netted concentration?
goldcust-drexumval-tgt-cust-00001c
recorded answer**cust-drexumval-tgt-cust-00001c**
This customer holds the highest netting metric value (460000) in the Zempinchoxxi scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of the current restatement (post-supersession), which customer in the Zempinchoxxi segment has the TOP netted concentration?
goldcust-brellixan-tgt-cust-00001c
recorded answer**cust-brellixan-tgt-cust-00001c**
This customer holds the highest netting metric value (460000) in the Zempinchoxxi scope across the 3 candidate entities evaluated.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAs of the current restatement (post-supersession), which customer in the Zempinchoxxi segment has the TOP netted concentration?
goldcust-quirzaben-tgt-cust-00001c
recorded answer**cust-quirzaben-tgt-cust-00001c**
This customer holds the highest netting metric value (460000) in the Zempinchoxxi scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich account in the Blirkathoxxi segment has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldacct-brizamento-tgt-acct-000045
recorded answer**acct-brizamento-tgt-acct-000045**
This account holds the highest computed risk metric value (400000.0) across the 4 candidate entities in the Blirkathoxxi scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich account in the Blirkathoxxi segment has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldacct-vrantoquel-tgt-acct-000045
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, I cannot definitively answer which account has the highest risk-weighted exposure.
**Reason:** The note explicitly states "value/risk in two sources; base can't compute the weighted exposure." Additionally, the data shows inconsistencies:
- Some accounts have `risk_score` while others have `riskScore` (different field names)
- Not all accounts have both contract value AND risk score populated together
- The accounts with clear risk scores (acct-quexolvant-tgt-acct-000047 at 0.9 risk, acct-vrantoquel-tgt-acct-000045 at 0.8 risk) have contract values of 80,000 and …[truncated]
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich account in the Blirkathoxxi segment has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldacct-zolbrixane-tgt-acct-000045
recorded answer**acct-zolbrixane-tgt-acct-000045**
This account holds the highest computed risk metric value (400000.0) in the Blirkathoxxi scope across the 4 candidate entities evaluated.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich account in the Blirkathuvvu segment has the LOWEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldacct-vibrandoxq-tgt-acct-000049
recorded answer# Risk-Weighted Exposure Analysis
Based on the facts provided, I need to identify accounts with risk scores and calculate risk-weighted exposure (contract value × risk score).
**Accounts with risk scores in Blirkathuvvu:**
1. **acct-vibrandoxq-tgt-acct-000049**: Contract value 60,000 × Risk score 0.2 = **12,000**
2. **acct-quexolvant-tgt-acct-00004a**: Contract value 200,000 × Risk score 0.4 = **80,000**
3. **acct-zamvoritql-tgt-acct-00004b**: Contract value 350,000 × Risk score 0.6 = **210,000**
**Answer:** **acct-vibrandoxq-tgt-acct-000049** has the lowest risk-weighted exposure at 12,00 …[truncated]
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich account in the Blirkathuvvu segment has the LOWEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldacct-zamvoritql-tgt-acct-000049
recorded answer**acct-zamvoritql-tgt-acct-000049**
This account holds the lowest computed risk metric value of 12000.0 in the Blirkathuvvu scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich account in the Blirkathuvvu segment has the LOWEST risk-weighted exposure?
goldacct-quaventriz-tgt-acct-000049
recorded answer**acct-quaventriz-tgt-acct-000049**
This account holds the lowest computed risk metric value of 12000.0 in the Blirkathuvvu scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich account in the Blirkathykki segment has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the accounts with the highest risk metric value in the Blirkathykki scope are:
**acct-quorzemantl-tgt-acct-00004e** and **acct-zentraquol-tgt-acct-00004d** (tied at 200000.0)
However, the facts note that "value/risk in two sources; base can't compute the weighted exposure," meaning a true risk-weighted exposure calculation cannot be completed from the available data.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich account in the Blirkathykki segment has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the accounts with the highest risk metric in the Blirkathykki scope are:
**acct-quaventriz-tgt-acct-00004e** and **acct-quexolvant-tgt-acct-00004d** (tied)
Both hold the maximum computed risk value of 200000.0.
However, note: The facts indicate that "value/risk in two sources; base can't compute the weighted exposure," meaning a true risk-weighted exposure calculation across both data sources cannot be fully determined from the available information.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich account in the Blirkathykki segment has the HIGHEST risk-weighted exposure?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, the accounts with the highest risk metric (200000.0) in the Blirkathykki scope are:
**acct-brimzavolt-tgt-acct-00004e** and **acct-zamvoritql-tgt-acct-00004d** (tied)
However, the facts note that "value/risk in two sources; base can't compute the weighted exposure," meaning a true risk-weighted exposure calculation cannot be completed from the available data.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory has the LEAST activity of any deal (zero touches -- stalled)?
golddeal-quantorvex-tgt-deal-000028
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **deal-quantorvex-tgt-deal-000028** is the committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory with zero touches (stalled).
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory has the LEAST activity of any deal (zero touches -- stalled)?
golddeal-brenquilax-tgt-deal-000028
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **deal-brenquilax-tgt-deal-000028** is the committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory with zero touches (stalled).
This is shown in the entity_rollup where this deal has `"touch_count": ["0"]` and `"stage": ["committed"]`.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory has the LEAST activity of any deal (zero touches -- stalled)?
golddeal-volmatriqz-tgt-deal-000028
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **deal-volmatriqz-tgt-deal-000028** is the committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory with zero touches (stalled).
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory has the MOST activity?
golddeal-quexvarnol-tgt-deal-000029
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **deal-quexvarnol-tgt-deal-000029** is the committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory with the most activity, having a touch_count of **14**.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory has the MOST activity?
golddeal-quantorvex-tgt-deal-000029
recorded answer**deal-quantorvex-tgt-deal-000029**
This deal has 14 touches (the highest activity count) and is in "committed" stage within the Blirkathulba scope.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory has the MOST activity?
golddeal-brivandoxz-tgt-deal-000029
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **deal-brivandoxz-tgt-deal-000029** is the committed deal in the Blirkathulba territory with the most activity, having a touch_count of **14**.
stancecommitted
✗ WRONGWhich committed deal in the Blirkathorpi territory is stalled (confirmed zero activity, LEAST engagement)?
golddeal-brenquilax-tgt-deal-00002c
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **deal-brenquilax-tgt-deal-00002c** is the committed deal in the Blirkathorpi territory with the least engagement.
It has a touch_count of **0**, indicating zero activity, while the other committed deal (deal-zibrantoq-tgt-deal-00002e) has a touch_count of 6.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich committed deal in the Blirkathorpi territory is stalled (confirmed zero activity, LEAST engagement)?
golddeal-zibrantoq-tgt-deal-00002c
recorded answer**deal-zibrantoq-tgt-deal-00002c**
This deal in the Blirkathorpi scope has a confirmed touch_count of 0 (zero activity) and is in "committed" stage, making it the stalled deal with the least engagement.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich committed deal in the Blirkathorpi territory is stalled (confirmed zero activity, LEAST engagement)?
golddeal-quantorvex-tgt-deal-00002c
recorded answer**deal-quantorvex-tgt-deal-00002c**
This deal in the Blirkathorpi scope has a stage metric value of 0 (the minimum/least engagement), with zero touch_count recorded across all activity records, confirming it is stalled with no engagement.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich tool in the Zempinchuvvu portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, licensed, and effectively zero feature usage)?
goldtool-zubrentiq-tgt-tool-00001f
recorded answer**tool-zubrentiq-tgt-tool-00001f**
This tool shows the wasteful pattern across all three dimensions:
- **Paid**: $38,000 (as of 2026-03-31)
- **Licensed**: 45 seats
- **Usage**: 0 feature events and 0 SSO logins (as of 2026-03-31)
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich tool in the Zempinchuvvu portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, licensed, and effectively zero feature usage)?
goldtool-vornalixet-tgt-tool-00001f
recorded answer**tool-vornalixet-tgt-tool-00001f**
This tool meets all criteria for wastefulness in the Zempinchuvvu scope:
- **Paid**: $38,000 (highest spend as of 2026-03-31)
- **Licensed**: 45 seats
- **Zero usage**: 0 feature events and 0 SSO logins as of 2026-03-31
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich tool in the Zempinchuvvu portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, licensed, and effectively zero feature usage)?
goldtool-quilzander-tgt-tool-00001f
recorded answer**tool-quilzander-tgt-tool-00001f**
This tool has:
- **Spend**: $38,000 (as of 2026-03-31)
- **Licensed seats**: 45
- **Usage**: 0 feature events and 0 SSO logins
It is the only candidate entity in the Zempinchuvvu scope and exhibits the wasteful profile of being fully paid and licensed with zero actual usage.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong paid and licensed tools in the Zempinchuvvu portfolio, which one has the HIGHEST utilization?
goldtool-trixanvold-tgt-tool-000020
recorded answer**tool-trixanvold-tgt-tool-000020**
This tool has the highest utilization in the Zempinchuvvu scope with a computed metric value of 1000, based on the triple metric analysis across spend (ap_spend), licensing (idp_entitlements: 60 licensed seats), and usage (usage_logs: 1000 sso_logins, 8000 feature_events).
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong paid and licensed tools in the Zempinchuvvu portfolio, which one has the HIGHEST utilization?
goldtool-brovantexi-tgt-tool-000020
recorded answer**tool-brovantexi-tgt-tool-000020**
This tool has the highest utilization metric (1000) among the 5 candidate entities in the Zempinchuvvu scope, based on the triple metric computation across spend, licenses, and usage data.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTAmong paid and licensed tools in the Zempinchuvvu portfolio, which one has the HIGHEST utilization?
goldtool-trixanvold-tgt-tool-000020
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **tool-trixanvold-tgt-tool-000020** is identified as having the highest metric value (1000) in the Zempinchuvvu scope.
However, the facts do not contain sufficient information to calculate or compare utilization rates across tools. The data shows spend, licensed seats, and usage logs exist for this tool, but no utilization metric (such as usage relative to licensed seats or spend efficiency) is computed in the provided facts.
**Answer: tool-trixanvold-tgt-tool-000020** (as the only entity with complete paid and licensed data in the discovery results)
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich tool in the Zempinchykki portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, licensed, zero feature usage)?
recorded answerBased on the facts provided, **tool-xelbraviq-tgt-tool-000024** is the most wasteful.
It has:
- **Highest spend**: 25,000 (tied with tool-vornalixet-tgt-tool-000025)
- **Highest licensed seats**: 40 (vs. 35 for the other tool)
- **Zero feature events and SSO logins** (as of 2026-03-31)
The combination of maximum spend, maximum licensing, and zero usage makes it the most wasteful tool in the Zempinchykki portfolio.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich tool in the Zempinchykki portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, licensed, zero feature usage)?
recorded answer**tool-vornalixet-tgt-tool-000024**
This tool has:
- AP spend: 25,000 (highest)
- Licensed seats: 40
- Feature events: 0
- SSO logins: 0
It is the most wasteful tool in the Zempinchykki scope based on the maximum spend metric with zero usage.
stancecommitted
✓ CORRECTWhich tool in the Zempinchykki portfolio is the MOST wasteful (paid, licensed, zero feature usage)?
recorded answer**tool-vornalixet-tgt-tool-000025**
This tool meets all criteria for wastefulness in the Zempinchykki scope:
- **Paid**: $25,000 in AP spend (as of 2026-03-31)
- **Licensed**: 35 licensed seats (as of 2026-03-31)
- **Zero feature usage**: 0 feature events and 0 SSO logins (as of 2026-03-31)
stancecommitted
Recorded runs — six questions, full evidence trail
Credibility & credentials
How this record was produced
—
Graded question-rows
no dated lab-campaign artifact names this figure — the 2026-08-02 citation is withdrawn, not replaced with a guess
—
Synthetic estates
no dated lab-campaign artifact names this figure — the 2026-08-02 citation is withdrawn, not replaced with a guess
3×
Instantiations per question
every published question graded uncached
—
Automated tests
no dated lab-campaign artifact names this figure — the 2026-08-02 citation is withdrawn, not replaced with a guess
23
Acceptance suite
runs twice before every deploy
20
Red-team questions
live gate before every deploy
≈1.09B
Tokens measured
recorded in the campaign ledger
Docs
page built from 5604abf + uncommitted edits · 2026-09-03 12:02 PST · record data generated 2026-07-15 22:37 PST